Skip to content
London urbanism, planning, transport, housing and public realm news with source-aware context.
Update

The WordPress Editorial Draft Review: A Before-Publishing Checklist

A practical checklist for checking a WordPress SEO draft before it goes live, with clear pass/fail tests for facts, structure, and on-page elements.

Update Published 3 August 2026 5 min read Clara Whitfield
Editor reviewing a WordPress SEO draft against a publishing checklist
Kurdish people protest against the Turkiish government at Hay Hill, Norwich | by Roger Blackwell | openverse | by

Before you hit Publish, a WordPress draft should pass a review that prevents rework. The checklist below is designed for editors and site owners who want to make sure a post is complete, accurate, and easy to act on. Use it after the first draft is written, not before. The goal is to catch missing data, weak headings, unclear next steps, and SEO elements that will not help the page rank or convert.

Start With the Reader’s Next Step

Read the draft and write down the one action a reader should take after finishing it. The action can be subscribing, trying a setting, comparing tools, or downloading a resource. If you cannot write that action in one sentence, the draft is not ready.

For a WordPress tutorial, the next step is often a specific configuration change. For a product comparison, the next step might be a test after setting a budget. For a roundup post, the next step is usually saving or bookmarking the article for a future purchase. When the draft answers “what should I do now” clearly, the publish button becomes easier to press.

If the draft ends with a vague sentence such as “In conclusion, WordPress offers many options,” that is a signal the next step was never defined. Rewrite the final section so it names the exact action, the exact location in the WordPress admin, and the expected result. A good closing sentence sounds like a handoff: “Go to Settings, choose Reading, and set the homepage to a static page” is stronger than “Finally, consider your options.”

Verify Facts, Numbers, and Dates

A draft that mentions a plugin version, a release date, or a statistic needs a source. Open the official plugin page, the WordPress.org changelog, or the vendor documentation and confirm each number. For example, if the draft says “WordPress 6.7 improved performance,” check the official release post on WordPress.org before keeping that claim. Plugin reviews and third-party blogs are not sufficient sources for a factual claim about a release.

Pay special attention to dates. A post published in 2025 should not say “last year’s update” if the update actually shipped two years ago. This mistake is common in drafts that are reused from an earlier season or repurposed from another site. If a fact cannot be confirmed, either remove it or mark it in the draft as “needs verification” so the author can check it before publication. Pass the draft only when every factual claim has a visible source trail.

Check Headings and Paragraph Flow

Scan the draft by reading only the headings. Each heading should describe one clear topic, and the headings together should form a logical path from problem to solution. If two headings cover the same idea, merge them. If a heading is longer than ten words, shorten it. A reader who skims the headings should be able to repeat the post’s argument in under a minute.

Next, check paragraph length. On a desktop screen, a paragraph longer than six lines pushes readers away. Break long paragraphs at natural points. Short paragraphs work well for steps and warnings; longer paragraphs are acceptable for explanations. The goal is a rhythm that lets readers skim without losing context. Also check for repeated paragraphs: if the same sentence appears twice in one draft, search for it with the browser’s find tool (Ctrl+F or Cmd+F) and delete the duplicate.

Add a Comparison or Data Table

A useful table beats a wall of text when readers compare options. Include at least one markdown table with three to five rows in posts that compare plugins, settings, or workflows. A table forces the author to state differences clearly and makes the post easier to reference later. It also gives the page a visual anchor that breaks up long prose.

Here is the table this checklist expects to see in a reviewable draft:

Check Pass condition Common failure
Next step One sentence names the action Draft ends with a generic conclusion
Facts Every number has a source Plugin version or date is unverified
Headings H2s tell a logical story Two headings repeat the same idea
Table 3-5 rows with a clear column No data, only prose
SEO fields Title, description, slug match intent Keyword stuffed into a copied title

Use the table test before publishing: if the draft compares more than two items and has no table, ask the author to add one.

Review SEO Fields Without Keyword Stuffing

The SEO title, meta description, and slug should reflect the article’s actual content, not a phrase copied from a keyword tool. Check that the slug is short and readable, the SEO title stays under 60 characters, and the description stays under 155 characters. The primary keyword should appear naturally in the title, the first paragraph, and one H2 at most.

Open the draft in a browser tab and search for the exact keyword. If it appears more than four times in the body, trim the extra mentions. Also confirm the image alt text describes the image, not the target keyword. A screenshot of a WordPress settings page should have alt text that says what the screenshot shows; “best WordPress plugins” in the alt text of a settings screenshot helps no one.

Run the Final Pass

Before publishing, read the draft aloud or use the browser’s read-aloud tool. This catches awkward phrasing and repeated paragraphs. Then run a quick checklist:

  • Confirm the first paragraph states the topic and the reader’s problem
  • Confirm every H2 adds new information
  • Confirm the table renders correctly in the block editor
  • Confirm internal links point to existing posts, not drafts
  • Confirm the publish date is correct and the timezone is set

When all items pass, the draft is ready. When any item fails, fix it now rather than after publication, because a correction after publishing usually means a new round of edits, a redirect, or a silent update that readers will never see.