Skip to content
London urbanism, planning, transport, housing and public realm news with source-aware context.
Update

What Amsterdam’s Parking Removal Drive Means for London’s Car‑Lite Ambitions

Amsterdam has removed more than 10,000 on‑street parking spaces since 2019 as part of its car‑lite street plan. For London, where Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and parking reforms are often contested, the Dutch capital’s approach offers a long‑term, data‑driven reference point.

Update Published 26 July 2026 4 min read Jonah Mercer
A street in Amsterdam where car parking has been removed, replaced by a cycle track and planted areas, illustrating the city’s autoluw policy.
Featured image from the source article

Amsterdam’s deliberate removal of more than 10,000 on‑street parking spaces since 2019, part of its “autoluw” (car‑lite) plan, has reshaped large parts of the city. The Dutch capital now aims to eliminate another 10,000 spaces by 2030, freeing road space for cycle paths, parks, and pedestrian areas. For London, where similar debates over Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) and kerbside reform are ongoing, the Amsterdam experience offers a concrete, long‑term case study in how a city can systematically shift street use away from cars.

The Amsterdam model

The plan, announced in 2019, involved not just parking removal but also the installation of modal filters — physical barriers that prevent through‑traffic on residential streets — and the conversion of former car lanes into bike lanes, green verges, and seating areas. According to a video analysis by Jason Slaughter of the urbanism channel Not Just Bikes, the results have been a “remarkable transformation” across the city. The approach is incremental but cumulative: each parking space removed is a small piece of a larger network that makes walking, cycling, and public transport more attractive and safer.

Key facts

Metric Amsterdam figure London comparable
On‑street parking spaces removed since 2019 More than 10,000 No single city‑wide target; boroughs remove spaces on a case‑by‑case basis
Target for additional removal by 2030 Another 10,000 spaces Not specified in current Mayor’s Transport Strategy
Main tools used Modal filters, lane removal, kerbside reallocation LTNs, Streetspace, timed loading bays, cycle‑lane conversions
Street‑space reallocation outcome Bike paths, parks, green spaces, seating Cycle lanes, wider footways, pocket parks, school streets

London parallels and differences

London’s transport policies have moved in a similar direction under the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, which aims for 80 per cent of trips to be made by active or public transport by 2041. The Streetspace programme, accelerated during the pandemic, introduced temporary cycle lanes, widened footways, and established Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in many boroughs. Parking removal has been a frequent element, though usually on a street‑by‑street or borough‑by‑borough basis rather than under a centrally coordinated, city‑wide target.

A 2024 report from the London Assembly’s Transport Committee noted that while LTNs have reduced traffic in some neighbourhoods, the lack of a consistent kerbside strategy and the political contentiousness of parking removal have slowed progress. Amsterdam’s experience shows that setting a hard metric — such as a specific number of spaces to be removed by a fixed date — can help depoliticise decisions and provide a clear benchmark for residents and businesses.

Challenges and local context

Any direct transfer of the Amsterdam model would face differences in governance, density, and car‑ownership patterns. London’s boroughs have independent control over parking and traffic management, which makes city‑wide targets difficult to enforce. The political cost of removing parking is also higher in areas where car dependency is stronger, such as outer London suburbs. Nonetheless, the Dutch example demonstrates that parking removal, when combined with visible improvements to public space, can build public support over time. Surveys in Amsterdam have shown growing approval for the autoluw policy as the benefits — quieter streets, better air quality, more space for children to play — become tangible.

What London can take away

The most immediate lesson is the value of a long‑term numerical target. London’s current Kerbside Strategy, published in 2023, sets out principles for reallocating kerbside space but does not include a parking‑removal quota. Amsterdam’s 10,000‑space reductions and the follow‑up target of another 10,000 by 2030 provide a clear, measurable commitment that can be tracked and communicated to the public. Planners and campaigners in London may point to this as a precedent for setting similar targets at the borough or regional level.

Conclusion

Amsterdam’s car‑lite street expansion is neither a blueprint to be copied wholesale nor a simple success story — it is a real‑world test of a policy that London has embraced in part but not yet with the same systematic ambition. For anyone following London’s transport and public‑realm debates, the Dutch capital’s progress offers a useful yardstick against which to measure local proposals.

Source: The Urbanist, “Sunday Video: Amsterdam Car‑Lite Streets Grow As Parking Gets Removed”, https://www.theurbanist.org/sunday-video-amsterdam-car-lite-streets-grow-as-parking-gets-removed/

Fuente

The Urbanist Publicacion original: 2026-07-26T14:52:55+00:00